Media freedom in South Korea has slipped to its lowest ranking ever, with the government “heavily influencing” public broadcasters and online censorship increasing dramatically.
Freedom House’s annual Freedom of the Press survey downgraded Korea ’s media freedom rating from “free” to “partly free” for the first time as it condemned Lee Myung-Bak’s administration.
Karin Karlekar, Managing Editor of the Freedom of the Press Index for Freedom House, said: “The Lee administration had influenced the politics within the three public broadcasting companies heavily.” She cites the example of ex-MBC President Ohm Ki-young, who eventually resigned after intense government pressure. He was asked to leave by two of Lee’s closest aides, while MBC shareholders belonging to a government-controlled group refused to back Ohm’s appointments. His resignation was seen as a protest against government interference.
This is not an isolated case, according to the Freedom House report, which claims Lee-Myung-bak has appointed his “allies” at a number of large media companies, despite journalists’ protests.
Such direct interference is a threat to media neutrality, and Jang Jang-soo, English editor of the Hankyoreh newspaper, believes that is already a serious problem. He said: “major media outlets… appear to be willing to cooperate with the Lee Myung-bak administration to distribute inaccurate information.”
He claims that the government’s “possible concealment and fabrications”, supported by a subservient media, makes truthful reporting very hard.
This extends as far as last year’s big news event, the sinking the Cheonan warship. While most major newspapers unquestioningly accepted the official report, the Hankyoreh has raised some serious concerns, in light of conflicting claims from both eyewitnesses and the Russian investigation. Jang-soo wants an independent investigation, saying: “We don’t have enough information to determine the truth.”
He stressed that The Hankyoreh, as with most small, independent publications, is free to report as it chooses. The conflicts arise for the big corporations, who must compete in a market over which the government holds great power.
A perfect example of this arose late last year, when the government personally selected news organizations to run lucrative new TV channels. Through the Korea Communications Commission (KCC) it awarded contracts to five corporations, who together will dominate the TV news agenda.
The result was that, as Kwon Eun-kyoung, English editor of thedailynk.com, told us: “The KCC inclined to major newspaper companies, which are conservative and friendly to the Lee administration.”
Censorship
The Freedom House report states that: "North Korea–related content has been heavily and explicitly filtered under the provisions of the National Security Law, which classifies content that ‘praises, promotes, and glorifies North Korea ’ as ‘illegal information.’” The report claims there are now 65 sites blocked under these terms.
Within days of their appearance the government had blocked the facebook and twitter accounts of Uriminzokkiri, a website run by the North Korean government targeting South Koreans. The government also, according to Eun-kyoung, monitors any pro-North Korea websites. She claims that such actions will continue as long as North Korean espionage activities, such as, potentially, the recent crippling of Nonghyup bank, continue.
Less inevitable is the recent case of Samsung pressuring Naver into removing a blog post critical of their Galaxy 2 smartphone, when the company used vague defamation laws to their advantage. One official said that they receive many similar requests every month, suggesting that online opinion is being shaped in the corporations favor.
Unsurprisingly, the report placed media freedom in North Korea among the world’s worst, with independent media “either non-existent or barely able to operate”.
Published in InDaegu http://www.in-daegu.com/PDFs/June2011.pdf
Published in InDaegu http://www.in-daegu.com/PDFs/June2011.pdf